Press "Enter" to skip to content

Voices: Sara Kyle, Principal Consultant, LE3Solutions

This
article is sponsored by Sentrics. In this Voices interview, Senior Housing News
sits down with LE3Solutions Principal Consultant Sara Kyle to learn the four
facets of senior living engagement, how operators can re-imagine their common
areas and outdoor spaces to create deeper engagement and how COVID-19 has
helped many communities tap into new skills that have changed the way they
build community and socialization.

Senior Housing News: You have a varied background,
including a PhD in kinesiology. Chart for us the journey from kinesiology to
what you do now at LE3. Is there anything specific from that background that
you’re able to draw on here?

Sara Kyle: I got involved in the
resident world via kinesiology, starting with internships. My first experience
was working in cardiac rehab, witnessing older adults come in and recover from
open-heart surgeries, watching the body repair itself predominately through
movement. In graduate school, I completed an internship based on senior
recreation, working at a local rec center, which is where I got my feet wet in
resident programming.

I started my PhD
determined to be a professor. But I always had this passion for older adults.
Ironically my first course was group dynamics with a 78-year-old professor named
Dr. Bettye Myers. She defied every ageist stereotype. She captivated me. I am not clinical. I say that all the time. I’m not a therapist
by trade, but what I do find is that the foundation of lifelong movement, and
how it relates to longevity and helping people live the life they want,
fascinates me.

That speaks to a certain principle of fundamentals in
working with people, specifically senior residents. I know you look at
engagement through four facets of life. What are they?

Resilience,
autonomy, purpose, connectedness.

For engagement to
work, the principal thing is to know someone as an individual. What I am trying
to urge is that instead of just looking at what someone did physically or
socially, use those four facets, which drive quality of life. That gives a more
complete story of engagement, rather than just looking at a resident’s
participation in a group or activity setting.

I think the problem
with engagement is that it’s such a soft science. We use anecdotal information,
and we do not put quantitative metrics around the discipline. But you
absolutely can. Resilience, for instance, is someone’s ability to cope with
whatever life throws at them. You learn from past experiences and end up
stronger, more equipped to deal with what is next.

The next one is
autonomy. How much self-governance do I have in my life? Am I able to make
choices on my own? And do I want to make those choices?

Purpose is simple:
Why do you get up? What is the passion that awakens you each morning? Why do you want to complete the day? And the
last one is connectedness: all the ways in which I matter to other people. The
sense that people need me and I need people, and what we gain from that
responsibility.

How have those four facets changed since the pandemic,
and how has your ability to help residents capture them changed as well?

We as an industry
weren’t focused on these before. We talked about autonomy and it was a big word
that we liked to use, but I don’t think that we really understood it the way we
understand it now. The same thing with “purpose.” When normal things are taken
away from you, you dig in a little deeper and self-reflect.

In fact, some
skills, traits and gifts that people possess have emerged. We’ve seen people
fulfill a purpose, based upon the needs of a community in COVID — checking on a
neighbor, calling a friend, selling masks, writing. There’s still a feeling of
connectedness, even if you can’t physically see someone. That’s why we keep
saying we’re physically distanced, but socially connected.

That has to be a large part of the value of LE3.

Yes. At LE3, we
look at different ways to measure engagement, quantify it and create programs
that are innovative. We ask, “What is the vision of engagement? What do we
want it to be? What does it look like when someone is engaged versus not
engaged? What are the business metrics that are affected when people are
engaged or not engaged?”

LE3 is intentional
on helping communities build new engagement options based on resident feedback.
Not just feedback on time at move-in, but continuous. People are ever evolving,
and because of that it is important to understand how a transition moving into
senior living can spark new interests and decrease others now that new options
are presented.

Lastly, how people
interact in a group setting versus how they crafted a route in their own home
can be different.

What practices have you seen adopted with residents
during COVID that you think should become permanent?

Meeting people
where they are — literally. When we explained the past model, we created
programs and calendars that gave people one option, and we tried to put enough
variety on that calendar to meet the needs of 100+ different people. We would
post this schedule in various places and wait for people to show up at the
designated location.

What’s changed is
we now go to the people where they are. When you go to people, you see who they
are very differently. We’ve engaged them in their own space in new ways. I
believe it has made us more focused on the resident than ever before. What are
we learning? We’re learning that people have a lot more talents that we needed
to rely on or gave them credit for.

We’ve also seen how
they have worked together as a community. They’ve shared experiences and
stories, and they’ve contacted their neighbors, they’ve written to each other,
and helped each other learn technology, such as FaceTime or Zoom. Residents are
going in and tutoring other residents. In some cases they are able to reduce
the one-on one tutoring that could fall on staff.

You’re talking about people doing things in their own
space. Obviously, among the four facets, connectedness is difficult during the
pandemic. Where is this engagement happening most in terms of physical location
within a community?

Everywhere. We’re
relying on every bit of space we have outside. I know it’s going to start
getting cooler, but we’ve been able to use outdoor spaces that we didn’t think
of before. Not only is it more space, and it’s outdoors where there’s clean
air, but being outdoors has significant benefits. Sunlight offers great
benefits for our bodies, including the vitamin D.

We’ve started to
look at spaces, redesign them and repurpose them. We’re asking ourselves how we
can use spaces to bring community together in a physically distanced way. Patio
dining, meditation areas with koi ponds and utilizing water features. Even well-lit
walking trails free of trip hazards and uneven surfaces, and lots of benches
for rest stops are becoming more common. Operators are realizing that outside
of their communities, many people use outdoor spaces through multiple seasons,
and they should too.

Despite the obvious advantages of being outdoors, we know
that a lot of engagement must also take place inside, including in each
resident’s unit. What to you is the big-picture lesson of what communities can
do to engage residents more strategically?

Flip the model.
Stop focusing on large group participation as the one metric. If you look at
the last four to five months and say, we didn’t have group participation, then
essentially what you’re saying is, we didn’t have engagement. The opposite of
that is we know that we’ve had an immense amount of engagement, it just looks
different. Just because you didn’t have someone who came to the walking class
doesn’t mean they’re not walking every day. The idea is to look at
participation differently. We need to look at how individuals spend their time,
what they’re doing, and then relate that back to quality of life, purpose,
connectedness, autonomy. Engagement is much bigger than just a single
department now.

As you said, one of the challenges that we
have is that a lot of communities are still sheltering in place, and that makes
things like walking, or even outside activities, difficult. I will say that the
pandemic has taught me that in-room engagement is no longer a passive activity.
All people, not just older people, are starting to engage with friends, family
and the activities that make them happy via technology. They are using their
phones, tablets and TVs to access exercise, music, telehealth services. No
matter what it is, residents want more of it.

Technology has truly expanded to meet the
needs of residents. In-room channels, connected devices, even applications
accessible over the TV now make in-room engagement easier for residents who
either can’t or choose to stay in their own units. And more communities are
offering everything from community information to activities over easy-to-use
devices like the TV. They are even broadcasting events into resident rooms that
used to be reserved as group activities. The possibilities are endless when
communities leverage the technology that’s already here.

How do communities balance this technology surge with
socialization? And how do families feel about this new trend?

Used strategically, technology can help
everyone. Giving residents the ability to view and register for activities
online, or plan their menu choices, gives them a sense of independence and
autonomy while giving caregivers more time to focus on resident needs.

Because technology leaves a bread crumb
trail, so to speak, sophisticated technologies can capture usage and assess
trends. Information about a resident’s level of socialization can be captured
automatically rather than via pen and paper. AI-based tools can feed content to
residents based on activity. And all of this information is available to family
members. It’s a whole new level of transparency we haven’t seen before.

It’s exciting to think about the
possibilities we can offer residents that we couldn’t offer even a year ago.

Editor’s
note: This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Sentrics delivers a comprehensive suite of
data-driven solutions that provide a 360-degree view of residents to help
senior living communities transform their operations from reactive to proactive
care. To find out how,
visit Sentrics.net.

The Voices
Series is a sponsored content program featuring leading executives discussing
trends and topics shaping their industry in a question-and-answer format. For
more information on Voices, please contact sales@agingmedia.com.

The post Voices: Sara Kyle, Principal Consultant, LE3Solutions appeared first on Senior Housing News.

Source: For the full article please visit Senior Housing News

Be First to Comment

    Leave a Reply

    %d bloggers like this: